News
item 14th July 2008
Methinks
Thou Protesteth Too Much, Ms. Mulligan.
We
have been passed copies of correspondence between one
of our supporters and Mary Mulligan MSP. It seems Ms.
Mulligan can’t get enough bloody noses to keep
her happy, so we are happy to oblige by giving her another!
In
a letter from Mr. Glasgow to his MSP, he asked…
Dear
Ms Mulligan, following a School visit to the Scottish
Parliament buildings recently where you met pupils,
you were reportedly asked about the future of St. John's
Hospital. Apparently your reply was that only a few
services would be removed from St. John's and that it
would become a 'specialist' hospital, whatever that
means.
Would
you please confirm that you are 100% supportive of no
further services being removed from St. John's as promised
by the Cabinet Secretary for Health and Wellbeing and
that you are 100% supportive of efforts to return St.
John's as a fully functioning emergency hospital as
required by the people of West Lothian?
I
look forward to receiving your response. Thank you.
Yours
faithfully,
Bill
Glasgow - June 21st 2008
Ms
Mulligan responded...
Dear
Mr Glasgow
I
am not sure which school group you are referring to
as I have attended quite a few in the last 2 weeks.
However, I do not remember discussing St John's Hospital
with any of them and would never have used the term
"specialist" as that is incorrect.
Let
me be clear. 2 services - trauma orthopaedics and emergency
surgery- were transferred from St John's Hospital to
the Edinburgh Royal Infirmary. I campaigned against
the services being transferred but given the circumstances
at the time it was the appropriate action.
However, I still believe the circumstances could change
again and the services could, at some time in the future
be returned. I also resigned my position within the
Scottish Executive as a Deputy Minister, not so much
to protest at the transfer but because I had concerns
about other services, and wanted to spend as much time
as possible securing the future of St Johns. Along with
my former colleague, Bristow Muldoon, we worked with
Lothian Health Board to ensure the necessary staff were
in place to maintain a medical A&E at St Johns;
and to ensure maternity services were maintained at
St Johns. We were also able to provide new services
such as the renal dialysis unit at St Johns and increase
the number of elective surgeries being carried out.
This
has taken time, and quite a bit of work on my part but
I believe my constituents deserve the best health service.
I did not go into last year's election promising to
return services, as the conditions were not right. Others
such as the SNP and so-called hospital campaigners did,
which showed they either did not understand the situation
or they deceived people to obtain votes - both scenarios
are regrettable. Let me assure you I will continue to
work to ensure my constituents have the best hospital
service whether at St Johns or elsewhere; and also the
best community health service delivered from the local
surgery.
I
hope this is helpful and makes my position clear.
Mary
Mulligan MSP - 2nd July 2008
In
her response, Ms. Mulligan displays a combination of
selective recall, ignorance of the facts, and a complete
distortion of the history of the fight for SJH. Nothing
new there then.
She
refers to the “so-called health campaigners”.
As the only group in West Lothian specifically campaigning
for a better deal in healthcare matters for our population,
we can only assume she means us. Quite what she means
by “so-called” is perplexing. We campaigned
on a mandate clearly and concisely aimed at the protection
and repatriation of services to St. John’s Hospital.
Nothing more, nothing less. This is quite unequivocal.
Ms.
Mulligan on the other hand changed course and policy
mid-election. At the beginning of her campaign, she
made no serious mention of SJH. Yes she had paid lip
service to the concerns of genuine campaigners, but
nowhere in her original election material did she highlight
the ongoing plight of the hospital. But all that changed
when the Labour Party realised just how seriously the
people of West Lothian were taking the plight of their
hospital. After issuing thousands of election leaflets,
there was a second distribution. And, yes, you’ve
guessed it; SJH was top of their priorities!
So
the only explanation of the “so-called”
remark is a poor attempt at self-deprecating humour,
perhaps? Don’t give up the day job Ms. Mulligan.
Or rather, do, and move over for someone who genuinely
believes in SJH as a fully functioning acute emergency
hospital!
We
in this party are long enough in the tooth to recognise
panic in a political party when they realise they have
entirely mis-judged public sentiment. The Labour Party
is now paying a heavy political price for their wilful
blindness, a trait that continues to be displayed in
some deluded corners of its membership.
As
for her comments about “deceit”, we would
not presume to argue with her obviously superior knowledge
of this particular subject. We do of course resent the
misapplication of the word to our Party. What we can
and will say once again is this: when she comes to terms
with the pummelling meted out to her party by the electorate
in West Lothian, she may be all the meeker a person
for the experience, and better placed to honestly represent
the health interests of her constituents.
Until
then, we will continue to defend OUR hospital from duplicitous
people, who by now really should know better.